Hi, On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 2:26 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 23:31:24 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > Hm, let me add 802154 folks. > > > > Either we should treat the commands as reserved in terms of uAPI > > even if they get removed the IDs won't be reused, or they are for > > testing purposes only. > > > > In the former case we should just remove the #ifdef around the values > > in the enum, it just leads to #ifdef proliferation while having no > > functional impact. > > > > In the latter case we should start error checking from the last > > non-experimental command, as we don't care about breaking the > > experimental ones. > > I haven't gone thru all of my inbox yet, but I see no reply from Stefan > or Alexander. My vote is to un-hide the EXPERIMENTAL commands. > fine for me if it's still in nl802154 and ends in error if somebody tries to use it and it's not compiled. But users should still consider it's not a stable API yet and we don't care about breaking it for now... - Alex
