Hi, On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 9:55 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > > Given the new information that I am currently processing, I believe the > array is not needed anymore, we can live with a minimal number of > additional helpers, like the one getting the PRF value for the UWB > PHYs. It's the only one I have in mind so far. I am not really sure if I understood now. So far those channel/page combinations are the same because we have no special "type" value in wpan_phy, what we currently support is the "normal" (I think they name it legacy devices) phy type (no UWB, sun phy, whatever) and as Channel Assignments says that it does not apply for those PHY's I think it there are channel/page combinations which are different according to the PHY "type". However we don't support them and I think there might be an upcoming type field in wpan_phy which might be set only once at registration time. - Alex
