Andreas Färber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> 於 2018年12月29日 週六 下午3:27寫道： > > Hi Jian-Hong, > > Am 16.12.18 um 11:18 schrieb Jian-Hong Pan: > > This patch adds a new address/protocol family for LoRaWAN network. > > It also implements the the functions and maps to Datagram socket for > > LoRaWAN unconfirmed data messages. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan <starnight@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > [...] > > include/linux/lora/lorawan_netdev.h | 52 +++ > > net/lorawan/Kconfig | 10 + > > net/lorawan/Makefile | 2 + > > net/lorawan/socket.c | 686 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 4 files changed, 750 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 include/linux/lora/lorawan_netdev.h > > create mode 100644 net/lorawan/Kconfig > > create mode 100644 net/lorawan/Makefile > > create mode 100644 net/lorawan/socket.c > > I'm not 100% happy with this yet, but to decouple it from the soft-MAC > discussion (patches 2-6/6) and to allow reuse by Ben, I've staged it in > linux-lora.git. > > We can clean it up with incremental patches there (and squash later). > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/lora/lorawan_netdev.h b/include/linux/lora/lorawan_netdev.h > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..5bffb5164f95 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/include/linux/lora/lorawan_netdev.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR BSD-3-Clause */ > > Is there any practical reason you dual-license your code? My LoRa code > is only GPL - should I reconsider that? I use dual-license due to the event "[Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] GPL defense issues" https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/2016-August/003580.html > > +/*- > > I assume the dash is a typo? > > > + * LoRaWAN stack related definitions > > + * > > + * Copyright (c) 2018 Jian-Hong, Pan <starnight@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > + * > > Leftover white line from old license header? > > > + */ > > + > > +#ifndef __LORAWAN_NET_DEVICE_H__ > > +#define __LORAWAN_NET_DEVICE_H__ > > + > > +enum { > > + LRW_ADDR_APPEUI, > > + LRW_ADDR_DEVEUI, > > + LRW_ADDR_DEVADDR, > > +}; > > + > > +struct lrw_addr_in { > > + int addr_type; > > + union { > > + u64 app_eui; > > + u64 dev_eui; > > In my RFC and in linux-lora.git I have a lora_eui typedef - any reason > you're not using it here? lora_eui is defined as a type of u8 array with 8 bytes in include/linux/lora/dev.h typedef u8 lora_eui[8]; It is not a basic nor simple data type. 1. There is the endian issue. LoRaWAN uses little endian for transmission. If u64 data type is used, we can call functions like cpu_to_le64 and le64_to_cpu to deal the endian jobs directly. 2. We can compare the EUIs with relational operators directly if the EUI is not a type of array. > > + u32 devaddr; > > + }; > > +}; > > + > > +struct sockaddr_lorawan { > > + sa_family_t family; /* AF_LORAWAN */ > > + struct lrw_addr_in addr_in; > > +}; > > + > > +/** > > + * lrw_mac_cb - This structure holds the control buffer (cb) of sk_buff > > + * > > + * @devaddr: the LoRaWAN device address of this LoRaWAN hardware > > + */ > > +struct lrw_mac_cb { > > + u32 devaddr; > > +}; > > + > > +/** > > + * lrw_get_mac_cb - Get the LoRaWAN MAC control buffer of the sk_buff > > + * @skb: the exchanging sk_buff > > + * > > + * Return: the pointer of LoRaWAN MAC control buffer > > + */ > > +static inline struct lrw_mac_cb *lrw_get_mac_cb(struct sk_buff *skb) > > +{ > > + return (struct lrw_mac_cb *)skb->cb; > > +} > > For LoRa I have a separate lora/skb.h - suggest to split this off into > its own header consistently. Sounds good. Do you prefer separate them into lora/skb.h or lora/lorawan_skb.h? > > + > > +#endif > > diff --git a/net/lorawan/Kconfig b/net/lorawan/Kconfig > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..bf6c9b77573b > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/net/lorawan/Kconfig > > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ > > +config LORAWAN > > + tristate "LoRaWAN Network support" > > The N in LoRaWAN is already for Network. :) > > > + help > > + LoRaWAN defines low data rate, low power and long range wireless > > + wide area networks. It was designed to organize networks of automation > > + devices, such as sensors, switches and actuators. It can operate > > + multiple kilometers wide. > > The missing information here to distinguish it from LoRa would be that > it's a client/server technology centered around gateways. In particular > gateways that anyone can run, distinguishing it from (Sigfox or) NB-IoT. > > > + > > + Say Y here to compile LoRaWAN support into the kernel or say M to > > + compile it as a module. > > diff --git a/net/lorawan/Makefile b/net/lorawan/Makefile > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..8c923ca6541a > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/net/lorawan/Makefile > > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ > > +obj-$(CONFIG_LORAWAN) += lorawan.o > > +lorawan-objs := socket.o > > Both Kconfig and Makefile are not integrated into net/ here. That > happens only in 6/6. > > > diff --git a/net/lorawan/socket.c b/net/lorawan/socket.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..7ef106b877ca > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/net/lorawan/socket.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,686 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR BSD-3-Clause > > +/*- > > ? > > > + * LoRaWAN stack related definitions > > + * > > + * Copyright (c) 2018 Jian-Hong, Pan <starnight@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > + * > > ? > > > + */ > > + > > +#define LORAWAN_MODULE_NAME "lorawan" > > + > > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) LORAWAN_MODULE_NAME ": " fmt > > + > > +#include <linux/init.h> > > +#include <linux/module.h> > > +#include <linux/list.h> > > +#include <linux/net.h> > > +#include <linux/if_arp.h> > > +#include <linux/termios.h> /* For TIOCOUTQ/INQ */ > > +#include <net/sock.h> > > +#include <linux/lora/lorawan_netdev.h> > > Please sort headers alphabetically. > > > + > > +/** > > + * dgram_sock - This structure holds the states of Datagram socket > > + * > > + * @sk: network layer representation of the socket > > + * sk must be the first member of dgram_sock > > Might that sentence be more useful as inline comment below? > > > + * @src_devaddr: the LoRaWAN device address for this connection > > + * @bound: this socket is bound or not > > + * @connected: this socket is connected to the destination or not > > + * @want_ack: this socket needs to ack for the connection or not > > Doesn't exist below? > > > + */ > > +struct dgram_sock { > > + struct sock sk; > > + u32 src_devaddr; > > + > > + u8 bound:1; > > + u8 connected:1; > > +}; > > + > > +static HLIST_HEAD(dgram_head); > > +static DEFINE_RWLOCK(dgram_lock); > > + > > +static struct dgram_sock * > > +dgram_sk(const struct sock *sk) > > +{ > > + return container_of(sk, struct dgram_sock, sk); > > +} > > + > > +static struct net_device * > > +lrw_get_dev_by_addr(struct net *net, u32 devaddr) > > +{ > > + __be32 be_addr = cpu_to_be32(devaddr); > > + struct net_device *ndev = NULL; > > + > > + rcu_read_lock(); > > + ndev = dev_getbyhwaddr_rcu(net, ARPHRD_LORAWAN, (char *)&be_addr); > > + if (ndev) > > + dev_hold(ndev); > > + rcu_read_unlock(); > > + > > + return ndev; > > +} > > + > > +static int > > +dgram_init(struct sock *sk) > > +{ > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static void > > +dgram_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout) > > +{ > > + sk_common_release(sk); > > +} > > + > > +static int > > +dgram_bind(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len) > > +{ > > + struct sockaddr_lorawan *addr = (struct sockaddr_lorawan *)uaddr; > > + struct dgram_sock *ro = dgram_sk(sk); > > + struct net_device *ndev; > > + int ret; > > + > > + lock_sock(sk); > > + ro->bound = 0; > > + > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > + if (len < sizeof(*addr)) > > + goto dgram_bind_end; > > + > > + if (addr->family != AF_LORAWAN) > > + goto dgram_bind_end; > > + > > + if (addr->addr_in.addr_type != LRW_ADDR_DEVADDR) > > + goto dgram_bind_end; > > + > > + pr_debug("%s: bind address %X\n", __func__, addr->addr_in.devaddr); > > + ndev = lrw_get_dev_by_addr(sock_net(sk), addr->addr_in.devaddr); > > + if (!ndev) { > > + ret = -ENODEV; > > + goto dgram_bind_end; > > + } > > + netdev_dbg(ndev, "%s: get ndev\n", __func__); > > + > > + if (ndev->type != ARPHRD_LORAWAN) { > > + ret = -ENODEV; > > + goto dgram_bind_end; > > This is leaking ndev. > > > + } > > + > > + ro->src_devaddr = addr->addr_in.devaddr; > > + ro->bound = 1; > > + ret = 0; > > + dev_put(ndev); > > + pr_debug("%s: bound address %X\n", __func__, ro->src_devaddr); > > + > > +dgram_bind_end: > > + release_sock(sk); > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > +static int > > +lrw_dev_hard_header(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ndev, > > + const u32 src_devaddr, size_t len) > > +{ > > + /* TODO: Prepare the LoRaWAN sending header here */ > > I wonder, is your idea that you would always write headers here but have > me ignore them in hard-MAC drivers by accessing data and not head? > > I.e., does this dgram (and a later seqpacket) implementation give us not > just the buffer to pass to hard-MAC or soft-MAC but actually LoRa, too, > so that maclorawan needs to further post-processing of header/checksum? I put lrw_dev_hard_header function here for the header processing nnd thought it might be called in the future originally. However, as you mentioned, we already have soft and hard-MAC and this abstraction layer only pass the buffer. So, it can be removed now. > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int > > +dgram_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size) > > +{ > > + struct dgram_sock *ro = dgram_sk(sk); > > + struct net_device *ndev; > > + struct sk_buff *skb; > > + size_t hlen; > > + size_t tlen; > > + int ret; > > + > > + pr_debug("%s: going to send %zu bytes", __func__, size); > > \n > > > + if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_OOB) { > > + pr_debug("msg->msg_flags = 0x%x\n", msg->msg_flags); > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > + } > > + > > + pr_debug("%s: check msg_name\n", __func__); > > + if (!ro->connected && !msg->msg_name) > > + return -EDESTADDRREQ; > > + else if (ro->connected && msg->msg_name) > > + return -EISCONN; > > + > > + pr_debug("%s: check bound\n", __func__); > > + if (!ro->bound) > > + ndev = dev_getfirstbyhwtype(sock_net(sk), ARPHRD_LORAWAN); > > + else > > + ndev = lrw_get_dev_by_addr(sock_net(sk), ro->src_devaddr); > > + > > + if (!ndev) { > > + pr_debug("no dev\n"); > > + ret = -ENXIO; > > + goto dgram_sendmsg_end; > > + } > > + > > + if (size > ndev->mtu) { > > + netdev_dbg(ndev, "size = %zu, mtu = %u\n", size, ndev->mtu); > > + ret = -EMSGSIZE; > > + goto dgram_sendmsg_end; > > Leaks at least ndev from lrw_get_dev_by_addr. > > > + } > > + > > + netdev_dbg(ndev, "%s: create skb\n", __func__); > > + hlen = LL_RESERVED_SPACE(ndev); > > + tlen = ndev->needed_tailroom; > > + skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(sk, hlen + tlen + size, > > + msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, > > + &ret); > > + > > + if (!skb) > > + goto dgram_sendmsg_no_skb; > > + > > + skb_reserve(skb, hlen); > > + skb_reset_network_header(skb); > > + > > + ret = lrw_dev_hard_header(skb, ndev, 0, size); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + goto dgram_sendmsg_no_skb; > > + > > + ret = memcpy_from_msg(skb_put(skb, size), msg, size); > > + if (ret > 0) > > + goto dgram_sendmsg_err_skb; > > + > > + skb->dev = ndev; > > + skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_LORAWAN); > > + > > + netdev_dbg(ndev, "%s: push skb to xmit queue\n", __func__); > > + ret = dev_queue_xmit(skb); > > + if (ret > 0) > > + ret = net_xmit_errno(ret); > > + netdev_dbg(ndev, "%s: pushed skb to xmit queue with ret=%d\n", > > + __func__, ret); > > + dev_put(ndev); > > + > > + return ret ?: size; > > + > > +dgram_sendmsg_err_skb: > > + kfree_skb(skb); > > +dgram_sendmsg_no_skb: > > + dev_put(ndev); > > + > > +dgram_sendmsg_end: > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > +static int > > +dgram_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, > > + int noblock, int flags, int *addr_len) > > +{ > > + DECLARE_SOCKADDR(struct sockaddr_lorawan *, saddr, msg->msg_name); > > + struct sk_buff *skb; > > + size_t copied = 0; > > + int err; > > + > > + skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags, noblock, &err); > > + if (!skb) > > + goto dgram_recvmsg_end; > > + > > + copied = skb->len; > > + if (len < copied) { > > + msg->msg_flags |= MSG_TRUNC; > > + copied = len; > > + } > > + > > + err = skb_copy_datagram_msg(skb, 0, msg, copied); > > + if (err) > > + goto dgram_recvmsg_done; > > + > > + sock_recv_ts_and_drops(msg, sk, skb); > > + if (saddr) { > > + memset(saddr, 0, sizeof(*saddr)); > > + saddr->family = AF_LORAWAN; > > + saddr->addr_in.devaddr = lrw_get_mac_cb(skb)->devaddr; > > + *addr_len = sizeof(*saddr); > > + } > > + > > + if (flags & MSG_TRUNC) > > + copied = skb->len; > > + > > +dgram_recvmsg_done: > > + skb_free_datagram(sk, skb); > > + > > +dgram_recvmsg_end: > > + if (err) > > + return err; > > + return copied; > > +} > > + > > +static int > > +dgram_hash(struct sock *sk) > > +{ > > + pr_debug("%s\n", __func__); > > + write_lock_bh(&dgram_lock); > > + sk_add_node(sk, &dgram_head); > > + sock_prot_inuse_add(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_prot, 1); > > + write_unlock_bh(&dgram_lock); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static void > > +dgram_unhash(struct sock *sk) > > +{ > > + pr_debug("%s\n", __func__); > > + write_lock_bh(&dgram_lock); > > + if (sk_del_node_init(sk)) > > + sock_prot_inuse_add(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_prot, -1); > > + write_unlock_bh(&dgram_lock); > > +} > > + > > +static int > > +dgram_connect(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len) > > +{ > > + struct dgram_sock *ro = dgram_sk(sk); > > + > > + /* Nodes of LoRaWAN send data to a gateway only, then data is received > > + * and transferred to servers with the gateway's policy. > > + * So, the destination address is not used by nodes. > > + */ > > + lock_sock(sk); > > + ro->connected = 1; > > + release_sock(sk); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int > > +dgram_disconnect(struct sock *sk, int flags) > > +{ > > + struct dgram_sock *ro = dgram_sk(sk); > > + > > + lock_sock(sk); > > + ro->connected = 0; > > + release_sock(sk); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int > > +dgram_ioctl(struct sock *sk, int cmd, unsigned long arg) > > +{ > > + struct net_device *ndev = sk->sk_dst_cache->dev; > > + struct sk_buff *skb; > > + int amount; > > + int err; > > + > > + netdev_dbg(ndev, "%s: ioctl file (cmd=0x%X)\n", __func__, cmd); > > + switch (cmd) { > > + case SIOCOUTQ: > > + amount = sk_wmem_alloc_get(sk); > > + err = put_user(amount, (int __user *)arg); > > + break; > > + case SIOCINQ: > > + amount = 0; > > + spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock); > > + skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue); > > + if (skb) { > > + /* We will only return the amount of this packet > > + * since that is all that will be read. > > + */ > > + amount = skb->len; > > + } > > + spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock); > > + err = put_user(amount, (int __user *)arg); > > + break; > > + default: > > + err = -ENOIOCTLCMD; > > + } > > + > > + return err; > > +} > > + > > +static int > > +dgram_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname, > > + char __user *optval, int __user *optlen) > > +{ > > + int val, len; > > + > > + if (level != SOL_LORAWAN) > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > + > > + if (get_user(len, optlen)) > > + return -EFAULT; > > + > > + len = min_t(unsigned int, len, sizeof(int)); > > + > > + switch (optname) { > > + default: > > + return -ENOPROTOOPT; > > + } > > + > > + if (put_user(len, optlen)) > > + return -EFAULT; > > + > > + if (copy_to_user(optval, &val, len)) > > + return -EFAULT; > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int > > +dgram_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname, > > + char __user *optval, unsigned int optlen) > > +{ > > + int val; > > + int err; > > + > > + err = 0; > > + > > + if (optlen < sizeof(int)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if (get_user(val, (int __user *)optval)) > > + return -EFAULT; > > + > > + lock_sock(sk); > > + > > + switch (optname) { > > + default: > > + err = -ENOPROTOOPT; > > + break; > > + } > > + > > + release_sock(sk); > > + > > + return err; > > +} > > + > > +static struct proto lrw_dgram_prot = { > > + .name = "LoRaWAN", > > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > > + .obj_size = sizeof(struct dgram_sock), > > + .init = dgram_init, > > + .close = dgram_close, > > + .bind = dgram_bind, > > + .sendmsg = dgram_sendmsg, > > + .recvmsg = dgram_recvmsg, > > + .hash = dgram_hash, > > + .unhash = dgram_unhash, > > + .connect = dgram_connect, > > + .disconnect = dgram_disconnect, > > + .ioctl = dgram_ioctl, > > + .getsockopt = dgram_getsockopt, > > + .setsockopt = dgram_setsockopt, > > +}; > > + > > +static int > > +lrw_sock_release(struct socket *sock) > > +{ > > + struct sock *sk = sock->sk; > > + > > + if (sk) { > > + sock->sk = NULL; > > + sk->sk_prot->close(sk, 0); > > + } > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int > > +lrw_sock_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len) > > +{ > > + struct sockaddr_lorawan *addr = (struct sockaddr_lorawan *)uaddr; > > + struct sock *sk = sock->sk; > > + > > + pr_debug("%s: bind address %X\n", __func__, addr->addr_in.devaddr); > > + if (sk->sk_prot->bind) > > + return sk->sk_prot->bind(sk, uaddr, addr_len); > > + > > + return sock_no_bind(sock, uaddr, addr_len); > > +} > > + > > +static int > > +lrw_sock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, > > + int addr_len, int flags) > > +{ > > + struct sock *sk = sock->sk; > > + > > + if (addr_len < sizeof(uaddr->sa_family)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + return sk->sk_prot->connect(sk, uaddr, addr_len); > > +} > > + > > +static int > > +lrw_ndev_ioctl(struct sock *sk, struct ifreq __user *arg, unsigned int cmd) > > +{ > > + struct net_device *ndev; > > + struct ifreq ifr; > > + int ret; > > + > > + pr_debug("%s: cmd %ud\n", __func__, cmd); > > + ret = -ENOIOCTLCMD; > > + > > + if (copy_from_user(&ifr, arg, sizeof(struct ifreq))) > > + return -EFAULT; > > + > > + ifr.ifr_name[IFNAMSIZ - 1] = 0; > > + > > + dev_load(sock_net(sk), ifr.ifr_name); > > + ndev = dev_get_by_name(sock_net(sk), ifr.ifr_name); > > + > > + netdev_dbg(ndev, "%s: cmd %ud\n", __func__, cmd); > > + if (!ndev) > > + return -ENODEV; > > + > > + if (ndev->type == ARPHRD_LORAWAN && ndev->netdev_ops->ndo_do_ioctl) > > + ret = ndev->netdev_ops->ndo_do_ioctl(ndev, &ifr, cmd); > > + > > + if (!ret && copy_to_user(arg, &ifr, sizeof(struct ifreq))) > > + ret = -EFAULT; > > + dev_put(ndev); > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > +static int > > +lrw_sock_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) > > +{ > > + struct sock *sk = sock->sk; > > + > > + pr_debug("%s: cmd %ud\n", __func__, cmd); > > + switch (cmd) { > > + case SIOCGSTAMP: > > + return sock_get_timestamp(sk, (struct timeval __user *)arg); > > + case SIOCGSTAMPNS: > > + return sock_get_timestampns(sk, (struct timespec __user *)arg); > > + case SIOCOUTQ: > > + case SIOCINQ: > > + if (!sk->sk_prot->ioctl) > > + return -ENOIOCTLCMD; > > + return sk->sk_prot->ioctl(sk, cmd, arg); > > + default: > > + return lrw_ndev_ioctl(sk, (struct ifreq __user *)arg, cmd); > > + } > > +} > > + > > +static int > > +lrw_sock_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len) > > +{ > > + struct sock *sk = sock->sk; > > + > > + pr_debug("%s: going to send %zu bytes\n", __func__, len); > > + return sk->sk_prot->sendmsg(sk, msg, len); > > +} > > + > > +static const struct proto_ops lrw_dgram_ops = { > > + .family = PF_LORAWAN, > > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > > + .release = lrw_sock_release, > > + .bind = lrw_sock_bind, > > + .connect = lrw_sock_connect, > > + .socketpair = sock_no_socketpair, > > + .accept = sock_no_accept, > > + .getname = sock_no_getname, > > + .poll = datagram_poll, > > + .ioctl = lrw_sock_ioctl, > > + .listen = sock_no_listen, > > + .shutdown = sock_no_shutdown, > > + .setsockopt = sock_common_setsockopt, > > + .getsockopt = sock_common_getsockopt, > > + .sendmsg = lrw_sock_sendmsg, > > + .recvmsg = sock_common_recvmsg, > > + .mmap = sock_no_mmap, > > + .sendpage = sock_no_sendpage, > > +}; > > + > > +static int > > +lorawan_creat(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol, int kern) > > create > Also, why lorawan_ here and lrw_ elsewhere? > > > +{ > > + struct sock *sk; > > + int ret; > > + > > + if (!net_eq(net, &init_net)) > > + return -EAFNOSUPPORT; > > + > > + if (sock->type != SOCK_DGRAM) > > + return -EAFNOSUPPORT; > > + > > + /* Allocates enough memory for dgram_sock whose first member is sk */ > > + sk = sk_alloc(net, PF_LORAWAN, GFP_KERNEL, &lrw_dgram_prot, kern); > > + if (!sk) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + sock->ops = &lrw_dgram_ops; > > + sock_init_data(sock, sk); > > + sk->sk_family = PF_LORAWAN; > > + sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED); > > + > > + if (sk->sk_prot->hash) { > > + ret = sk->sk_prot->hash(sk); > > + if (ret) { > > + sk_common_release(sk); > > + goto lorawan_creat_end; > > + } > > + } > > + > > + if (sk->sk_prot->init) { > > + ret = sk->sk_prot->init(sk); > > + if (ret) > > + sk_common_release(sk); > > + } > > + > > +lorawan_creat_end: > > create > > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > +static const struct net_proto_family lorawan_family_ops = { > > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > > + .family = PF_LORAWAN, > > + .create = lorawan_creat, > > +}; > > + > > +static int > > +lrw_dgram_deliver(struct net_device *ndev, struct sk_buff *skb) > > +{ > > + struct dgram_sock *ro; > > + struct sock *sk; > > + bool found; > > + int ret; > > + > > + ret = NET_RX_SUCCESS; > > + found = false; > > In times of C99 you could probably fold that into the declarations. > > > + > > + read_lock(&dgram_lock); > > + sk_for_each(sk, &dgram_head) { > > + ro = dgram_sk(sk); > > + if (cpu_to_be32(ro->src_devaddr) == *(__be32 *)ndev->dev_addr) { > > + found = true; > > + break; > > + } > > + } > > + read_unlock(&dgram_lock); > > + > > + if (!found) > > + goto lrw_dgram_deliver_err; > > + > > + skb = skb_share_check(skb, GFP_ATOMIC); > > + if (!skb) > > + return NET_RX_DROP; > > + > > + if (sock_queue_rcv_skb(sk, skb) < 0) > > + goto lrw_dgram_deliver_err; > > + > > + return ret; > > + > > +lrw_dgram_deliver_err: > > + kfree_skb(skb); > > + ret = NET_RX_DROP; > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > +static int > > +lorawan_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ndev, > > + struct packet_type *pt, struct net_device *orig_ndev) > > +{ > > + if (!netif_running(ndev)) > > + goto lorawan_rcv_drop; > > + > > + if (!net_eq(dev_net(ndev), &init_net)) > > + goto lorawan_rcv_drop; > > + > > + if (ndev->type != ARPHRD_LORAWAN) > > + goto lorawan_rcv_drop; > > + > > + if (skb->pkt_type != PACKET_OTHERHOST) > > + return lrw_dgram_deliver(ndev, skb); > > + > > +lorawan_rcv_drop: > > + kfree_skb(skb); > > + return NET_RX_DROP; > > +} > > + > > +static struct packet_type lorawan_packet_type = { > > + .type = htons(ETH_P_LORAWAN), > > + .func = lorawan_rcv, > > +}; > > + > > +static int __init > > +lrw_sock_init(void) > > +{ > > + int ret; > > + > > + pr_info("module inserted\n"); > > + ret = proto_register(&lrw_dgram_prot, 1); > > + if (ret) > > + goto lrw_sock_init_end; > > + > > + /* Tell SOCKET that we are alive */ > > Drop? > > > + ret = sock_register(&lorawan_family_ops); > > + if (ret) > > + goto lrw_sock_init_err; > > + > > + dev_add_pack(&lorawan_packet_type); > > + ret = 0; > > + goto lrw_sock_init_end; > > + > > +lrw_sock_init_err: > > + proto_unregister(&lrw_dgram_prot); > > + > > +lrw_sock_init_end: > > + return 0; > > return ret;? > > > +} > > + > > +static void __exit > > +lrw_sock_exit(void) > > +{ > > + dev_remove_pack(&lorawan_packet_type); > > + sock_unregister(PF_LORAWAN); > > + proto_unregister(&lrw_dgram_prot); > > + pr_info("module removed\n"); > > +} > > + > > +module_init(lrw_sock_init); > > +module_exit(lrw_sock_exit); > > + > > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Jian-Hong Pan, <starnight@xxxxxxxxxxxx>"); > > Drop the comma? > > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("LoRaWAN socket kernel module"); > > Aren't they all kernel modules? :) > > > +MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL"); > > +MODULE_ALIAS_NETPROTO(PF_LORAWAN); Thanks for the reviewing. Preparing the fixing patches now. :) Jain-Hong Pan
