Hi Jian-Hong,
Am 16.12.18 um 11:18 schrieb Jian-Hong Pan:
> This patch adds a new address/protocol family for LoRaWAN network.
> It also implements the the functions and maps to Datagram socket for
> LoRaWAN unconfirmed data messages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan <starnight@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[...]
> include/linux/lora/lorawan_netdev.h | 52 +++
> net/lorawan/Kconfig | 10 +
> net/lorawan/Makefile | 2 +
> net/lorawan/socket.c | 686 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 750 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/lora/lorawan_netdev.h
> create mode 100644 net/lorawan/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 net/lorawan/Makefile
> create mode 100644 net/lorawan/socket.c
I'm not 100% happy with this yet, but to decouple it from the soft-MAC
discussion (patches 2-6/6) and to allow reuse by Ben, I've staged it in
linux-lora.git.
We can clean it up with incremental patches there (and squash later).
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/lora/lorawan_netdev.h b/include/linux/lora/lorawan_netdev.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5bffb5164f95
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/lora/lorawan_netdev.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR BSD-3-Clause */
Is there any practical reason you dual-license your code? My LoRa code
is only GPL - should I reconsider that?
> +/*-
I assume the dash is a typo?
> + * LoRaWAN stack related definitions
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2018 Jian-Hong, Pan <starnight@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + *
Leftover white line from old license header?
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __LORAWAN_NET_DEVICE_H__
> +#define __LORAWAN_NET_DEVICE_H__
> +
> +enum {
> + LRW_ADDR_APPEUI,
> + LRW_ADDR_DEVEUI,
> + LRW_ADDR_DEVADDR,
> +};
> +
> +struct lrw_addr_in {
> + int addr_type;
> + union {
> + u64 app_eui;
> + u64 dev_eui;
In my RFC and in linux-lora.git I have a lora_eui typedef - any reason
you're not using it here?
> + u32 devaddr;
> + };
> +};
> +
> +struct sockaddr_lorawan {
> + sa_family_t family; /* AF_LORAWAN */
> + struct lrw_addr_in addr_in;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * lrw_mac_cb - This structure holds the control buffer (cb) of sk_buff
> + *
> + * @devaddr: the LoRaWAN device address of this LoRaWAN hardware
> + */
> +struct lrw_mac_cb {
> + u32 devaddr;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * lrw_get_mac_cb - Get the LoRaWAN MAC control buffer of the sk_buff
> + * @skb: the exchanging sk_buff
> + *
> + * Return: the pointer of LoRaWAN MAC control buffer
> + */
> +static inline struct lrw_mac_cb *lrw_get_mac_cb(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + return (struct lrw_mac_cb *)skb->cb;
> +}
For LoRa I have a separate lora/skb.h - suggest to split this off into
its own header consistently.
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/net/lorawan/Kconfig b/net/lorawan/Kconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..bf6c9b77573b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/net/lorawan/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +config LORAWAN
> + tristate "LoRaWAN Network support"
The N in LoRaWAN is already for Network. :)
> + help
> + LoRaWAN defines low data rate, low power and long range wireless
> + wide area networks. It was designed to organize networks of automation
> + devices, such as sensors, switches and actuators. It can operate
> + multiple kilometers wide.
The missing information here to distinguish it from LoRa would be that
it's a client/server technology centered around gateways. In particular
gateways that anyone can run, distinguishing it from (Sigfox or) NB-IoT.
> +
> + Say Y here to compile LoRaWAN support into the kernel or say M to
> + compile it as a module.
> diff --git a/net/lorawan/Makefile b/net/lorawan/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8c923ca6541a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/net/lorawan/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +obj-$(CONFIG_LORAWAN) += lorawan.o
> +lorawan-objs := socket.o
Both Kconfig and Makefile are not integrated into net/ here. That
happens only in 6/6.
> diff --git a/net/lorawan/socket.c b/net/lorawan/socket.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7ef106b877ca
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/net/lorawan/socket.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,686 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR BSD-3-Clause
> +/*-
?
> + * LoRaWAN stack related definitions
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2018 Jian-Hong, Pan <starnight@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + *
?
> + */
> +
> +#define LORAWAN_MODULE_NAME "lorawan"
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) LORAWAN_MODULE_NAME ": " fmt
> +
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/net.h>
> +#include <linux/if_arp.h>
> +#include <linux/termios.h> /* For TIOCOUTQ/INQ */
> +#include <net/sock.h>
> +#include <linux/lora/lorawan_netdev.h>
Please sort headers alphabetically.
> +
> +/**
> + * dgram_sock - This structure holds the states of Datagram socket
> + *
> + * @sk: network layer representation of the socket
> + * sk must be the first member of dgram_sock
Might that sentence be more useful as inline comment below?
> + * @src_devaddr: the LoRaWAN device address for this connection
> + * @bound: this socket is bound or not
> + * @connected: this socket is connected to the destination or not
> + * @want_ack: this socket needs to ack for the connection or not
Doesn't exist below?
> + */
> +struct dgram_sock {
> + struct sock sk;
> + u32 src_devaddr;
> +
> + u8 bound:1;
> + u8 connected:1;
> +};
> +
> +static HLIST_HEAD(dgram_head);
> +static DEFINE_RWLOCK(dgram_lock);
> +
> +static struct dgram_sock *
> +dgram_sk(const struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + return container_of(sk, struct dgram_sock, sk);
> +}
> +
> +static struct net_device *
> +lrw_get_dev_by_addr(struct net *net, u32 devaddr)
> +{
> + __be32 be_addr = cpu_to_be32(devaddr);
> + struct net_device *ndev = NULL;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + ndev = dev_getbyhwaddr_rcu(net, ARPHRD_LORAWAN, (char *)&be_addr);
> + if (ndev)
> + dev_hold(ndev);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + return ndev;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +dgram_init(struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +dgram_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
> +{
> + sk_common_release(sk);
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +dgram_bind(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len)
> +{
> + struct sockaddr_lorawan *addr = (struct sockaddr_lorawan *)uaddr;
> + struct dgram_sock *ro = dgram_sk(sk);
> + struct net_device *ndev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + lock_sock(sk);
> + ro->bound = 0;
> +
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + if (len < sizeof(*addr))
> + goto dgram_bind_end;
> +
> + if (addr->family != AF_LORAWAN)
> + goto dgram_bind_end;
> +
> + if (addr->addr_in.addr_type != LRW_ADDR_DEVADDR)
> + goto dgram_bind_end;
> +
> + pr_debug("%s: bind address %X\n", __func__, addr->addr_in.devaddr);
> + ndev = lrw_get_dev_by_addr(sock_net(sk), addr->addr_in.devaddr);
> + if (!ndev) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto dgram_bind_end;
> + }
> + netdev_dbg(ndev, "%s: get ndev\n", __func__);
> +
> + if (ndev->type != ARPHRD_LORAWAN) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto dgram_bind_end;
This is leaking ndev.
> + }
> +
> + ro->src_devaddr = addr->addr_in.devaddr;
> + ro->bound = 1;
> + ret = 0;
> + dev_put(ndev);
> + pr_debug("%s: bound address %X\n", __func__, ro->src_devaddr);
> +
> +dgram_bind_end:
> + release_sock(sk);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +lrw_dev_hard_header(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ndev,
> + const u32 src_devaddr, size_t len)
> +{
> + /* TODO: Prepare the LoRaWAN sending header here */
I wonder, is your idea that you would always write headers here but have
me ignore them in hard-MAC drivers by accessing data and not head?
I.e., does this dgram (and a later seqpacket) implementation give us not
just the buffer to pass to hard-MAC or soft-MAC but actually LoRa, too,
so that maclorawan needs to further post-processing of header/checksum?
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +dgram_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size)
> +{
> + struct dgram_sock *ro = dgram_sk(sk);
> + struct net_device *ndev;
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + size_t hlen;
> + size_t tlen;
> + int ret;
> +
> + pr_debug("%s: going to send %zu bytes", __func__, size);
\n
> + if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_OOB) {
> + pr_debug("msg->msg_flags = 0x%x\n", msg->msg_flags);
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + pr_debug("%s: check msg_name\n", __func__);
> + if (!ro->connected && !msg->msg_name)
> + return -EDESTADDRREQ;
> + else if (ro->connected && msg->msg_name)
> + return -EISCONN;
> +
> + pr_debug("%s: check bound\n", __func__);
> + if (!ro->bound)
> + ndev = dev_getfirstbyhwtype(sock_net(sk), ARPHRD_LORAWAN);
> + else
> + ndev = lrw_get_dev_by_addr(sock_net(sk), ro->src_devaddr);
> +
> + if (!ndev) {
> + pr_debug("no dev\n");
> + ret = -ENXIO;
> + goto dgram_sendmsg_end;
> + }
> +
> + if (size > ndev->mtu) {
> + netdev_dbg(ndev, "size = %zu, mtu = %u\n", size, ndev->mtu);
> + ret = -EMSGSIZE;
> + goto dgram_sendmsg_end;
Leaks at least ndev from lrw_get_dev_by_addr.
> + }
> +
> + netdev_dbg(ndev, "%s: create skb\n", __func__);
> + hlen = LL_RESERVED_SPACE(ndev);
> + tlen = ndev->needed_tailroom;
> + skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(sk, hlen + tlen + size,
> + msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT,
> + &ret);
> +
> + if (!skb)
> + goto dgram_sendmsg_no_skb;
> +
> + skb_reserve(skb, hlen);
> + skb_reset_network_header(skb);
> +
> + ret = lrw_dev_hard_header(skb, ndev, 0, size);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto dgram_sendmsg_no_skb;
> +
> + ret = memcpy_from_msg(skb_put(skb, size), msg, size);
> + if (ret > 0)
> + goto dgram_sendmsg_err_skb;
> +
> + skb->dev = ndev;
> + skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_LORAWAN);
> +
> + netdev_dbg(ndev, "%s: push skb to xmit queue\n", __func__);
> + ret = dev_queue_xmit(skb);
> + if (ret > 0)
> + ret = net_xmit_errno(ret);
> + netdev_dbg(ndev, "%s: pushed skb to xmit queue with ret=%d\n",
> + __func__, ret);
> + dev_put(ndev);
> +
> + return ret ?: size;
> +
> +dgram_sendmsg_err_skb:
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> +dgram_sendmsg_no_skb:
> + dev_put(ndev);
> +
> +dgram_sendmsg_end:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +dgram_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
> + int noblock, int flags, int *addr_len)
> +{
> + DECLARE_SOCKADDR(struct sockaddr_lorawan *, saddr, msg->msg_name);
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + size_t copied = 0;
> + int err;
> +
> + skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags, noblock, &err);
> + if (!skb)
> + goto dgram_recvmsg_end;
> +
> + copied = skb->len;
> + if (len < copied) {
> + msg->msg_flags |= MSG_TRUNC;
> + copied = len;
> + }
> +
> + err = skb_copy_datagram_msg(skb, 0, msg, copied);
> + if (err)
> + goto dgram_recvmsg_done;
> +
> + sock_recv_ts_and_drops(msg, sk, skb);
> + if (saddr) {
> + memset(saddr, 0, sizeof(*saddr));
> + saddr->family = AF_LORAWAN;
> + saddr->addr_in.devaddr = lrw_get_mac_cb(skb)->devaddr;
> + *addr_len = sizeof(*saddr);
> + }
> +
> + if (flags & MSG_TRUNC)
> + copied = skb->len;
> +
> +dgram_recvmsg_done:
> + skb_free_datagram(sk, skb);
> +
> +dgram_recvmsg_end:
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + return copied;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +dgram_hash(struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + pr_debug("%s\n", __func__);
> + write_lock_bh(&dgram_lock);
> + sk_add_node(sk, &dgram_head);
> + sock_prot_inuse_add(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_prot, 1);
> + write_unlock_bh(&dgram_lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +dgram_unhash(struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + pr_debug("%s\n", __func__);
> + write_lock_bh(&dgram_lock);
> + if (sk_del_node_init(sk))
> + sock_prot_inuse_add(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_prot, -1);
> + write_unlock_bh(&dgram_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +dgram_connect(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len)
> +{
> + struct dgram_sock *ro = dgram_sk(sk);
> +
> + /* Nodes of LoRaWAN send data to a gateway only, then data is received
> + * and transferred to servers with the gateway's policy.
> + * So, the destination address is not used by nodes.
> + */
> + lock_sock(sk);
> + ro->connected = 1;
> + release_sock(sk);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +dgram_disconnect(struct sock *sk, int flags)
> +{
> + struct dgram_sock *ro = dgram_sk(sk);
> +
> + lock_sock(sk);
> + ro->connected = 0;
> + release_sock(sk);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +dgram_ioctl(struct sock *sk, int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + struct net_device *ndev = sk->sk_dst_cache->dev;
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + int amount;
> + int err;
> +
> + netdev_dbg(ndev, "%s: ioctl file (cmd=0x%X)\n", __func__, cmd);
> + switch (cmd) {
> + case SIOCOUTQ:
> + amount = sk_wmem_alloc_get(sk);
> + err = put_user(amount, (int __user *)arg);
> + break;
> + case SIOCINQ:
> + amount = 0;
> + spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
> + skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
> + if (skb) {
> + /* We will only return the amount of this packet
> + * since that is all that will be read.
> + */
> + amount = skb->len;
> + }
> + spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
> + err = put_user(amount, (int __user *)arg);
> + break;
> + default:
> + err = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +dgram_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> + char __user *optval, int __user *optlen)
> +{
> + int val, len;
> +
> + if (level != SOL_LORAWAN)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + if (get_user(len, optlen))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + len = min_t(unsigned int, len, sizeof(int));
> +
> + switch (optname) {
> + default:
> + return -ENOPROTOOPT;
> + }
> +
> + if (put_user(len, optlen))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (copy_to_user(optval, &val, len))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +dgram_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> + char __user *optval, unsigned int optlen)
> +{
> + int val;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = 0;
> +
> + if (optlen < sizeof(int))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (get_user(val, (int __user *)optval))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + lock_sock(sk);
> +
> + switch (optname) {
> + default:
> + err = -ENOPROTOOPT;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + release_sock(sk);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static struct proto lrw_dgram_prot = {
> + .name = "LoRaWAN",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .obj_size = sizeof(struct dgram_sock),
> + .init = dgram_init,
> + .close = dgram_close,
> + .bind = dgram_bind,
> + .sendmsg = dgram_sendmsg,
> + .recvmsg = dgram_recvmsg,
> + .hash = dgram_hash,
> + .unhash = dgram_unhash,
> + .connect = dgram_connect,
> + .disconnect = dgram_disconnect,
> + .ioctl = dgram_ioctl,
> + .getsockopt = dgram_getsockopt,
> + .setsockopt = dgram_setsockopt,
> +};
> +
> +static int
> +lrw_sock_release(struct socket *sock)
> +{
> + struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
> +
> + if (sk) {
> + sock->sk = NULL;
> + sk->sk_prot->close(sk, 0);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +lrw_sock_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len)
> +{
> + struct sockaddr_lorawan *addr = (struct sockaddr_lorawan *)uaddr;
> + struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
> +
> + pr_debug("%s: bind address %X\n", __func__, addr->addr_in.devaddr);
> + if (sk->sk_prot->bind)
> + return sk->sk_prot->bind(sk, uaddr, addr_len);
> +
> + return sock_no_bind(sock, uaddr, addr_len);
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +lrw_sock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
> + int addr_len, int flags)
> +{
> + struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
> +
> + if (addr_len < sizeof(uaddr->sa_family))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return sk->sk_prot->connect(sk, uaddr, addr_len);
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +lrw_ndev_ioctl(struct sock *sk, struct ifreq __user *arg, unsigned int cmd)
> +{
> + struct net_device *ndev;
> + struct ifreq ifr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + pr_debug("%s: cmd %ud\n", __func__, cmd);
> + ret = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(&ifr, arg, sizeof(struct ifreq)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + ifr.ifr_name[IFNAMSIZ - 1] = 0;
> +
> + dev_load(sock_net(sk), ifr.ifr_name);
> + ndev = dev_get_by_name(sock_net(sk), ifr.ifr_name);
> +
> + netdev_dbg(ndev, "%s: cmd %ud\n", __func__, cmd);
> + if (!ndev)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + if (ndev->type == ARPHRD_LORAWAN && ndev->netdev_ops->ndo_do_ioctl)
> + ret = ndev->netdev_ops->ndo_do_ioctl(ndev, &ifr, cmd);
> +
> + if (!ret && copy_to_user(arg, &ifr, sizeof(struct ifreq)))
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + dev_put(ndev);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +lrw_sock_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
> +
> + pr_debug("%s: cmd %ud\n", __func__, cmd);
> + switch (cmd) {
> + case SIOCGSTAMP:
> + return sock_get_timestamp(sk, (struct timeval __user *)arg);
> + case SIOCGSTAMPNS:
> + return sock_get_timestampns(sk, (struct timespec __user *)arg);
> + case SIOCOUTQ:
> + case SIOCINQ:
> + if (!sk->sk_prot->ioctl)
> + return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> + return sk->sk_prot->ioctl(sk, cmd, arg);
> + default:
> + return lrw_ndev_ioctl(sk, (struct ifreq __user *)arg, cmd);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +lrw_sock_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
> +{
> + struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
> +
> + pr_debug("%s: going to send %zu bytes\n", __func__, len);
> + return sk->sk_prot->sendmsg(sk, msg, len);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct proto_ops lrw_dgram_ops = {
> + .family = PF_LORAWAN,
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .release = lrw_sock_release,
> + .bind = lrw_sock_bind,
> + .connect = lrw_sock_connect,
> + .socketpair = sock_no_socketpair,
> + .accept = sock_no_accept,
> + .getname = sock_no_getname,
> + .poll = datagram_poll,
> + .ioctl = lrw_sock_ioctl,
> + .listen = sock_no_listen,
> + .shutdown = sock_no_shutdown,
> + .setsockopt = sock_common_setsockopt,
> + .getsockopt = sock_common_getsockopt,
> + .sendmsg = lrw_sock_sendmsg,
> + .recvmsg = sock_common_recvmsg,
> + .mmap = sock_no_mmap,
> + .sendpage = sock_no_sendpage,
> +};
> +
> +static int
> +lorawan_creat(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol, int kern)
create
Also, why lorawan_ here and lrw_ elsewhere?
> +{
> + struct sock *sk;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!net_eq(net, &init_net))
> + return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
> +
> + if (sock->type != SOCK_DGRAM)
> + return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
> +
> + /* Allocates enough memory for dgram_sock whose first member is sk */
> + sk = sk_alloc(net, PF_LORAWAN, GFP_KERNEL, &lrw_dgram_prot, kern);
> + if (!sk)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + sock->ops = &lrw_dgram_ops;
> + sock_init_data(sock, sk);
> + sk->sk_family = PF_LORAWAN;
> + sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED);
> +
> + if (sk->sk_prot->hash) {
> + ret = sk->sk_prot->hash(sk);
> + if (ret) {
> + sk_common_release(sk);
> + goto lorawan_creat_end;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (sk->sk_prot->init) {
> + ret = sk->sk_prot->init(sk);
> + if (ret)
> + sk_common_release(sk);
> + }
> +
> +lorawan_creat_end:
create
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct net_proto_family lorawan_family_ops = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .family = PF_LORAWAN,
> + .create = lorawan_creat,
> +};
> +
> +static int
> +lrw_dgram_deliver(struct net_device *ndev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct dgram_sock *ro;
> + struct sock *sk;
> + bool found;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = NET_RX_SUCCESS;
> + found = false;
In times of C99 you could probably fold that into the declarations.
> +
> + read_lock(&dgram_lock);
> + sk_for_each(sk, &dgram_head) {
> + ro = dgram_sk(sk);
> + if (cpu_to_be32(ro->src_devaddr) == *(__be32 *)ndev->dev_addr) {
> + found = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + read_unlock(&dgram_lock);
> +
> + if (!found)
> + goto lrw_dgram_deliver_err;
> +
> + skb = skb_share_check(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (!skb)
> + return NET_RX_DROP;
> +
> + if (sock_queue_rcv_skb(sk, skb) < 0)
> + goto lrw_dgram_deliver_err;
> +
> + return ret;
> +
> +lrw_dgram_deliver_err:
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + ret = NET_RX_DROP;
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +lorawan_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ndev,
> + struct packet_type *pt, struct net_device *orig_ndev)
> +{
> + if (!netif_running(ndev))
> + goto lorawan_rcv_drop;
> +
> + if (!net_eq(dev_net(ndev), &init_net))
> + goto lorawan_rcv_drop;
> +
> + if (ndev->type != ARPHRD_LORAWAN)
> + goto lorawan_rcv_drop;
> +
> + if (skb->pkt_type != PACKET_OTHERHOST)
> + return lrw_dgram_deliver(ndev, skb);
> +
> +lorawan_rcv_drop:
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + return NET_RX_DROP;
> +}
> +
> +static struct packet_type lorawan_packet_type = {
> + .type = htons(ETH_P_LORAWAN),
> + .func = lorawan_rcv,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init
> +lrw_sock_init(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + pr_info("module inserted\n");
> + ret = proto_register(&lrw_dgram_prot, 1);
> + if (ret)
> + goto lrw_sock_init_end;
> +
> + /* Tell SOCKET that we are alive */
Drop?
> + ret = sock_register(&lorawan_family_ops);
> + if (ret)
> + goto lrw_sock_init_err;
> +
> + dev_add_pack(&lorawan_packet_type);
> + ret = 0;
> + goto lrw_sock_init_end;
> +
> +lrw_sock_init_err:
> + proto_unregister(&lrw_dgram_prot);
> +
> +lrw_sock_init_end:
> + return 0;
return ret;?
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit
> +lrw_sock_exit(void)
> +{
> + dev_remove_pack(&lorawan_packet_type);
> + sock_unregister(PF_LORAWAN);
> + proto_unregister(&lrw_dgram_prot);
> + pr_info("module removed\n");
> +}
> +
> +module_init(lrw_sock_init);
> +module_exit(lrw_sock_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Jian-Hong Pan, <starnight@xxxxxxxxxxxx>");
Drop the comma?
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("LoRaWAN socket kernel module");
Aren't they all kernel modules? :)
> +MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
> +MODULE_ALIAS_NETPROTO(PF_LORAWAN);
Regards,
Andreas
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
