Hello.
On 19/09/15 00:14, Alexander Aring wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:44:15PM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 01:52:46PM +0200, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
....
btw:
Something is wrong at iana registration:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/_6lowpan-parameters/_6lowpan-parameters.xhtml#lowpan_nhc
For RFC6282 they did each entry for each extension header, for GHC not.
Don't know why :-(
Also iana says it's
10110EEN whereas RFC7400 says it's 1011EIDN
^
|
I don't know where this bit comes from.
it isn't wrong, GHC EID is defined for 0-3 only so the first bit is
always zero. So 10110 E E N is right whereas:
1011000N -> Hop
1011001N -> Routing
1011010N -> Fragment
1011011N -> Destination
Seems like Mobility and IPv6 is not defined for GHC.
But I still don't know why iana put it for RFC6282 in a new entry on the
list for each EID and for GHC they did only one entry for the mask without
EID bits.
I guess we could ask them if we really want to know.
regards
Stefan Schmidt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
