On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:44:15PM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 01:52:46PM +0200, Stefan Schmidt wrote: .... > > btw: > > Something is wrong at iana registration: > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/_6lowpan-parameters/_6lowpan-parameters.xhtml#lowpan_nhc > > For RFC6282 they did each entry for each extension header, for GHC not. > > Don't know why :-( > > Also iana says it's > > 10110EEN whereas RFC7400 says it's 1011EIDN > ^ > | > I don't know where this bit comes from. > it isn't wrong, GHC EID is defined for 0-3 only so the first bit is always zero. So 10110 E E N is right whereas: 1011000N -> Hop 1011001N -> Routing 1011010N -> Fragment 1011011N -> Destination Seems like Mobility and IPv6 is not defined for GHC. But I still don't know why iana put it for RFC6282 in a new entry on the list for each EID and for GHC they did only one entry for the mask without EID bits. - Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
