Hello.
On 20/08/15 18:47, Alexander Aring wrote:
This patch moves the open count handling while doing open of a lowpan
interface. We need the packet handler register at first when one lowpan
interface is up.
The code itself looks fine, but I have trouble to gte the why from your
commit message. Why is this change needed?
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@xxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ieee802154/6lowpan/core.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ieee802154/6lowpan/core.c b/net/ieee802154/6lowpan/core.c
index 3cc76f0..8e9da1d 100644
--- a/net/ieee802154/6lowpan/core.c
+++ b/net/ieee802154/6lowpan/core.c
@@ -76,9 +76,27 @@ static int lowpan_dev_init(struct net_device *ldev)
return 0;
}
+static int lowpan_open(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ if (!open_count)
+ lowpan_rx_init();
+ open_count++;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int lowpan_stop(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ open_count--;
+ if (!open_count)
+ lowpan_rx_exit();
+ return 0;
+}
+
static const struct net_device_ops lowpan_netdev_ops = {
.ndo_init = lowpan_dev_init,
.ndo_start_xmit = lowpan_xmit,
+ .ndo_open = lowpan_open,
+ .ndo_stop = lowpan_stop,
};
static void lowpan_setup(struct net_device *ldev)
@@ -149,11 +167,6 @@ static int lowpan_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *ldev,
}
wdev->ieee802154_ptr->lowpan_dev = ldev;
- if (!open_count)
- lowpan_rx_init();
-
- open_count++;
-
return 0;
}
@@ -163,11 +176,6 @@ static void lowpan_dellink(struct net_device *ldev, struct list_head *head)
ASSERT_RTNL();
- open_count--;
-
- if (!open_count)
- lowpan_rx_exit();
-
wdev->ieee802154_ptr->lowpan_dev = NULL;
unregister_netdevice(ldev);
dev_put(wdev);
Signed-off-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
regards
Stefan Schmidt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
