Hi Alex,
You can ignore the previous email! I have just seen your email from
Sunday explaining what you have done.
I somehow became unsubscribed from this mailing list over the weekend so
didn't get the emails...
Simon
On 23/06/15 16:34, Simon Vincent wrote:
Hi Alex,
Do you have your security/nl802154 work available anywhere I can have
a look?
I am in the process of getting 802.15.4 security working on our
devices. I don't want to implement it using the old interface as I
will then have to recode our application when llsec moves over to
nl802154.
I have some spare time at the moment to develop/review/test the
security layer.
Simon
On 18/06/15 20:43, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello.
On 18/06/15 17:58, Simon Vincent wrote:
Hi,
On 18/06/15 16:42, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello.
On 18/06/15 14:31, Alexander Aring wrote:
Hi all,
I saw the latest discussion about the security layer and wants to
open a
new thread about discussion for access this layer over nl802154 and
putting a "very easy to use" functionality into iwpan.
I need to admit, I never tested myself this layer, also I told many
times that the step to put security layer functionality into
nl802154 is
a necessary step. For that reason I declare the security layer as
broken.
Several months ago I started to put these functionality into
wpan-tools
and nl802154. It's just parsing a file at the moment and putting
the all
relevant entries for key, device, seclevel tables in cfg802154.
Nothing
more. These tables are handled like an ACL in 802.15.4 (so far I
know)
and necessary to do the "key lookup" procedure, on receiving
decrypted
frames.
At weekend I will try to provide my stuff which I already have
done and
will try to explain what the idea for the next necessary steps
are. It's
just to start a discussion "How do deal with accessing llsec over
nl802154/cfg802154".
After we can accessing the sec layer over nl802154, we can
hopefully remove
the old interface stuff.
Does this sounds like a plan?
I think this is a good idea and I would gladly gve this some
testing next week. I bet Simon would do as well as he is currently
looking into it.
Yes it would nice to tidy this all up and get a stable interface. I
currently have some time to look at this and do some testing.
You have by any chance some small example code you used for testing
the llc stuff? It would be handy to start with something small and easy.
regards
Stefan Schmidt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
