> On 01 October 2014 at 02:25 Alexander Aring <alex.aring@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:34:08PM +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote: > > lowpan_frags_sysctl_register is only called by __init lowpan_net_frag_init > > (part of the lowpan module). > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > This is untested. > > > > net/ieee802154/reassembly.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/net/ieee802154/reassembly.c b/net/ieee802154/reassembly.c > > index 32755cb..30ec608 100644 > > --- a/net/ieee802154/reassembly.c > > +++ b/net/ieee802154/reassembly.c > > @@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ static void __net_exit > > lowpan_frags_ns_sysctl_unregister(struct net *net) > > > > static struct ctl_table_header *lowpan_ctl_header; > > > > -static int lowpan_frags_sysctl_register(void) > > +static int __init lowpan_frags_sysctl_register(void) > > yes right, but there is more lacks of missing "__init". See below. > > > { > > lowpan_ctl_header = register_net_sysctl(&init_net, > > "net/ieee802154/6lowpan", > > @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static void lowpan_frags_sysctl_unregister(void) > > unregister_net_sysctl_table(lowpan_ctl_header); > > } > > #else > > -static inline int lowpan_frags_ns_sysctl_register(struct net *net) > > +static inline int __init lowpan_frags_ns_sysctl_register(struct net *net) > > This is wrong, it's callback from "struct pernet_operations lowpan_frags_ops". > > > { > > return 0; > > } > > > Your patch adds "__init" now for two different functions and we have > two different declarations for these functions, depends if CONFIG_SYSCTL is > enabled. > > Now if CONFIG_SYSCTL select we have as lowpan_frags_sysctl_register > declaration: > > static int __init lowpan_frags_sysctl_register(void) > > if not: > > static inline int lowpan_frags_sysctl_register(void) > > Same for lowpan_frags_ns_sysctl_register and vice versa for CONFIG_SYSCTL. > > Your changes are for two different functions (Don't know if you realized > that): Hi Alexander, I didn't see _ns_ . I'll send the right fix based on wpan-next. Thanks, Fabian > > "lowpan_frags_sysctl_register" and "lowpan_frags_ns_sysctl_register", > which makes no sense. Also lowpan_frags_ns_sysctl_register isn't called > by module init which is wrong. > > > To make "correct" cleanup for this "__init" should be add to the functions, > for > both declarations if CONFIG_SYSCTL is set or not: > > - lowpan_net_frag_init > - lowpan_frags_sysctl_register > > > I see now it's already applied, David please revert this change. Are you > fine to apply a correct version of this to wpan-next tree, next time? > > - Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html