On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 07:53:50PM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote: > On 02/09/14 17:26, Alexander Aring wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 05:06:32PM +0100, Simon Vincent wrote: > >>This is not a problem. There is a fix elsewhere for that. > >> > >>I am using local-link addresses. > >> > >>I am seeing funny things like: > >>lowpan0: received packet from fe80::203:9a00:41:c864 -> > >>7707:ffff:300:0:9a:300:7b3b:3a1a > >> > >>Src address fe80::203:9a00:41:c864 does not exist on the network and > >>destination address 7707:ffff:300:0:9a:300:7b3b:3a1a does not. > >> > >Where do you capture this? You know that wireshark on a lowpan interface > >is broken? > > > >- Alex > >-- > >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in > >the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Hi Alex, > > I'm working with Simon and these are from printf statements, we've stepped > through the code and seen the same problem. > > It would be nice to have a better testing environment, you mentioned that > you have a virtual setup, does this allow for multiple nodes sending > receiving packets like the contiki one? if so do you have instructions on > how to setup? > for testing you could use fakelb or tony's serial virtual interface [0]. I didn't test both of them, but we need some testing interface of course. The virtual serial interface require the serial driver. Sorry for my late reply. [0] https://github.com/tcheneau/virtual-ieee802154-serial -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
