Hi Ivo, On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Ivo Van Doorn <ivdoorn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > >> This ensures that a user cannot accidentally set up a virtual interface >> with a MAC address the rt2800 hw cannot handle. >> >> Reported-by: Petr Stetiar <ynezz@xxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 3 +++ >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c >> b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c >> index c0441a7..7f0df12 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c >> @@ -5108,6 +5108,9 @@ static int rt2800_probe_hw_mode(struct rt2x00_dev >> *rt2x00dev) >> rt2x00_eeprom_addr(rt2x00dev, >> EEPROM_MAC_ADDR_0)); >> >> + /* Only the last three bits are variable in rt2800 devices. */ >> + rt2x00dev->hw->wiphy->addr_mask[ETH_ALEN - 1] = 0x7; > > > Shouldn't this be added for rt61pci and rt73usb as well? I'm not 100% sure if the same is true in rt61pci and rt73usb. Are they also using an address mask? Thanks, Helmut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
