On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 03:33:00PM -0600, Seth Forshee wrote: > > That seems reasonable. Have you any significant impact in throughput > > with tracing enabled? > > I've really only tested with tracing enabled. Compared to before this > patch series the peak performance (as measured with iperf using a TCP > connection) is close enough that any differences would be lost in the > noise, and average performance is better due to the transfer rate being > more stable. I'll run some tests with and without tracing enabled to > compare the results. I may not get to it before next week though due to > the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US. I've done some unscientific comparison between builds with and without BRCM_TRACING enabled. UDP iperf performance was identical, both send and receive. With TCP the difference in throughput was small, definitely within the range of noise for my small sample size. So as far as I can tell enabling tracing has a negligible impact on throughput. Seth -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
