Hi Ben, On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It appears hard to get well-shielded u.fl (IPEX) to SMA pigtails, and all of > the > modern ath9k NICs I've seen use u.fl connectors on the NIC. > > I have found a vendor that will do double-shielded 1.32mm cable, and I have > some of those > on order, but the way u.fl connectors are made it seems there is always a > bit of un-shielded > cable where the connector is crimped onto the cable. > > I am curious if anyone has any suggestions or experience with connecting > u.fl NICs to > SMA cables in a highly shielded manner... I have an awful feeling that it's simply not going to happen - I would guess from what you've described that the u.fl connector is designed to be cheap, small and easy and not really designed for "real" work like what you're doing with it. I'm guessing that the signal leakage through the connector is probably not a problem for the manufacturers as they're always shielded inside a computer case - i.e. it complies with the FCC rules. Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ .Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
