On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:35:43 -0500, Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote :
> Realtek devices with designation RTL8188CE-VL have the so-called B-cut
> of the wireless chip. This patch adds the special programming needed by
> these devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Anisse Astier <anisse@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Li Chaoming <chaoming_li@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/phy_common.c | 21 +++++++
> drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/def.h | 3 +
> drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/hw.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/phy.c | 4 +-
> drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/sw.c | 6 +-
> drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/trx.c | 4 +-
> 6 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> ---
> V1 => V2 Remove extraneous white space.
>
>
> John,
>
> This patch is too invasive to backport to the stable kernels, thus it should
> be applied to 3.7.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Larry
> ---
>
[snip]
> Index: wireless-testing-new/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/hw.c
> ===================================================================
> --- wireless-testing-new.orig/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/hw.c
> +++ wireless-testing-new/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/hw.c
> @@ -896,7 +896,6 @@ int rtl92ce_hw_init(struct ieee80211_hw
> struct rtl_phy *rtlphy = &(rtlpriv->phy);
> struct rtl_pci *rtlpci = rtl_pcidev(rtl_pcipriv(hw));
> struct rtl_ps_ctl *ppsc = rtl_psc(rtl_priv(hw));
> - static bool iqk_initialized; /* initialized to false */
> bool rtstatus = true;
> bool is92c;
> int err;
> @@ -921,9 +920,28 @@ int rtl92ce_hw_init(struct ieee80211_hw
>
> rtlhal->last_hmeboxnum = 0;
> rtl92c_phy_mac_config(hw);
> + /* because last function modify RCR, so we update
> + * rcr var here, or TP will unstable for receive_config
> + * is wrong, RX RCR_ACRC32 will cause TP unstabel & Rx
> + * RCR_APP_ICV will cause mac80211 unassoc for cisco 1252*/
> + rtlpci->receive_config = rtl_read_dword(rtlpriv, REG_RCR);
> + rtlpci->receive_config &= ~(RCR_ACRC32 | RCR_AICV);
> + rtl_write_dword(rtlpriv, REG_RCR, rtlpci->receive_config);
> rtl92c_phy_bb_config(hw);
> rtlphy->rf_mode = RF_OP_BY_SW_3WIRE;
> rtl92c_phy_rf_config(hw);
> + if (IS_VENDOR_UMC_A_CUT(rtlhal->version) &&
> + !IS_92C_SERIAL(rtlhal->version)) {
> + rtl_set_rfreg(hw, RF90_PATH_A, RF_RX_G1, MASKDWORD, 0x30255);
> + rtl_set_rfreg(hw, RF90_PATH_A, RF_RX_G2, MASKDWORD, 0x50a00);
> + } else if (IS_81xxC_VENDOR_UMC_B_CUT(rtlhal->version)) {
> + rtl_set_rfreg(hw, RF90_PATH_A, 0x0C, MASKDWORD, 0x894AE);
> + rtl_set_rfreg(hw, RF90_PATH_A, 0x0A, MASKDWORD, 0x1AF31);
> + rtl_set_rfreg(hw, RF90_PATH_A, RF_IPA, MASKDWORD, 0x8F425);
> + rtl_set_rfreg(hw, RF90_PATH_A, RF_SYN_G2, MASKDWORD, 0x4F200);
> + rtl_set_rfreg(hw, RF90_PATH_A, RF_RCK1, MASKDWORD, 0x44053);
> + rtl_set_rfreg(hw, RF90_PATH_A, RF_RCK2, MASKDWORD, 0x80201);
> + }
> rtlphy->rfreg_chnlval[0] = rtl_get_rfreg(hw, (enum radio_path)0,
> RF_CHNLBW, RFREG_OFFSET_MASK);
> rtlphy->rfreg_chnlval[1] = rtl_get_rfreg(hw, (enum radio_path)1,
> @@ -945,11 +963,11 @@ int rtl92ce_hw_init(struct ieee80211_hw
>
> if (ppsc->rfpwr_state == ERFON) {
> rtl92c_phy_set_rfpath_switch(hw, 1);
> - if (iqk_initialized) {
> + if (rtlphy->iqk_initialized) {
> rtl92c_phy_iq_calibrate(hw, true);
> } else {
> rtl92c_phy_iq_calibrate(hw, false);
> - iqk_initialized = true;
> + rtlphy->iqk_initialized = true;
> }
>
> rtl92c_dm_check_txpower_tracking(hw);
> @@ -1004,6 +1022,13 @@ static enum version_8192c _rtl92ce_read_
> ? CHIP_VENDOR_UMC_B_CUT : CHIP_UNKNOWN) |
> CHIP_VENDOR_UMC));
> }
> + if (IS_92C_SERIAL(version)) {
> + value32 = rtl_read_dword(rtlpriv, REG_HPON_FSM);
> + version = (enum version_8192c)(version |
> + ((CHIP_BONDING_IDENTIFIER(value32)
> + == CHIP_BONDING_92C_1T2R) ?
> + RF_TYPE_1T2R : 0));
> + }
> }
>
> switch (version) {
> @@ -1019,12 +1044,30 @@ static enum version_8192c _rtl92ce_read_
> case VERSION_A_CHIP_88C:
> versionid = "A_CHIP_88C";
> break;
> + case VERSION_NORMAL_UMC_CHIP_92C_1T2R_A_CUT:
> + versionid = "A_CUT_92C_1T2R";
> + break;
> + case VERSION_NORMAL_UMC_CHIP_92C_A_CUT:
> + versionid = "A_CUT_92C";
> + break;
> + case VERSION_NORMAL_UMC_CHIP_88C_A_CUT:
> + versionid = "A_CUT_88C";
> + break;
> + case VERSION_NORMAL_UMC_CHIP_92C_1T2R_B_CUT:
> + versionid = "B_CUT_92C_1T2R";
> + break;
> + case VERSION_NORMAL_UMC_CHIP_92C_B_CUT:
> + versionid = "B_CUT_92C";
> + break;
> + case VERSION_NORMAL_UMC_CHIP_88C_B_CUT:
> + versionid = "B_CUT_88C";
> + break;
> default:
> versionid = "Unknown. Bug?";
> break;
> }
>
> - RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_INIT, DBG_TRACE,
> + RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_INIT, DBG_EMERG,
> "Chip Version ID: %s\n", versionid);
>
> switch (version & 0x3) {
> @@ -1197,6 +1240,7 @@ static void _rtl92ce_poweroff_adapter(st
> {
> struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv = rtl_priv(hw);
> struct rtl_pci_priv *rtlpcipriv = rtl_pcipriv(hw);
> + struct rtl_hal *rtlhal = rtl_hal(rtlpriv);
> u8 u1b_tmp;
> u32 u4b_tmp;
>
> @@ -1225,7 +1269,8 @@ static void _rtl92ce_poweroff_adapter(st
> rtl_write_word(rtlpriv, REG_GPIO_IO_SEL, 0x0790);
> rtl_write_word(rtlpriv, REG_LEDCFG0, 0x8080);
> rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, REG_AFE_PLL_CTRL, 0x80);
> - rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, REG_SPS0_CTRL, 0x23);
> + if (!IS_81xxC_VENDOR_UMC_B_CUT(rtlhal->version))
> + rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv, REG_SPS0_CTRL, 0x23);
> if (rtlpcipriv->bt_coexist.bt_coexistence) {
> u4b_tmp = rtl_read_dword(rtlpriv, REG_AFE_XTAL_CTRL);
> u4b_tmp |= 0x03824800;
> @@ -1254,6 +1299,9 @@ void rtl92ce_card_disable(struct ieee802
> rtlpriv->cfg->ops->led_control(hw, LED_CTL_POWER_OFF);
> RT_SET_PS_LEVEL(ppsc, RT_RF_OFF_LEVL_HALT_NIC);
> _rtl92ce_poweroff_adapter(hw);
> +
> + /* after power off we should do iqk again */
> + rtlpriv->phy.iqk_initialized = false;
> }
>
> void rtl92ce_interrupt_recognized(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
This part:
> @@ -1355,9 +1403,9 @@ static void _rtl92ce_read_txpower_info_f
> tempval = hwinfo[EEPROM_TXPOWERHT40_2SDIFF + i];
> else
> tempval = EEPROM_DEFAULT_HT40_2SDIFF;
> - rtlefuse->eeprom_chnlarea_txpwr_ht40_2sdiif[RF90_PATH_A][i] =
> + rtlefuse->eprom_chnl_txpwr_ht40_2sdf[RF90_PATH_A][i] =
> (tempval & 0xf);
> - rtlefuse->eeprom_chnlarea_txpwr_ht40_2sdiif[RF90_PATH_B][i] =
> + rtlefuse->eprom_chnl_txpwr_ht40_2sdf[RF90_PATH_B][i] =
> ((tempval & 0xf0) >> 4);
> }
>
> @@ -1381,7 +1429,7 @@ static void _rtl92ce_read_txpower_info_f
> "RF(%d) EEPROM HT40 2S Diff Area(%d) = 0x%x\n",
> rf_path, i,
> rtlefuse->
> - eeprom_chnlarea_txpwr_ht40_2sdiif[rf_path][i]);
> + eprom_chnl_txpwr_ht40_2sdf[rf_path][i]);
>
> for (rf_path = 0; rf_path < 2; rf_path++) {
> for (i = 0; i < 14; i++) {
> @@ -1396,14 +1444,14 @@ static void _rtl92ce_read_txpower_info_f
> if ((rtlefuse->
> eeprom_chnlarea_txpwr_ht40_1s[rf_path][index] -
> rtlefuse->
> - eeprom_chnlarea_txpwr_ht40_2sdiif[rf_path][index])
> + eprom_chnl_txpwr_ht40_2sdf[rf_path][index])
> > 0) {
> rtlefuse->txpwrlevel_ht40_2s[rf_path][i] =
> rtlefuse->
> eeprom_chnlarea_txpwr_ht40_1s[rf_path]
> [index] -
> rtlefuse->
> - eeprom_chnlarea_txpwr_ht40_2sdiif[rf_path]
> + eprom_chnl_txpwr_ht40_2sdf[rf_path]
> [index];
> } else {
> rtlefuse->txpwrlevel_ht40_2s[rf_path][i] = 0;
wasn't in V1 of the patch. Is the rename normal?
Anisse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
