On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 10:44 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > Thanks. I just got that far as well, but I hadn't set up a DHCP > server ... I'll debug further, I just confirmed that association still > works. Ok I can't reproduce the problem. You're going to have to be more specific about what connman sets up, I think. Here's what I did: * brctl addbr br0 * ip addr add ... br0 * ip link set br0 up * start dnsmasq on br0 * start wpa_supplicant on wlan0, with -Dnl80211 -bbr0 -iwlan0 -c../cfg * brctl addif br0 wlan0 Maybe this isn't exactly what connman does, but it works for me with kernel 3.5.4, a 6230 Intel device and 1.0 wpa_supplicant. Can you capture exactly what connman does? Also, are you sure that reverting just the carrier state patch isn't sufficient? It seems to me that the carrier state patch might confuse the bridge code, but I really see no reason Eric's change should have any impact at all. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
