Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Is this supposed to be bit #29 - I notice that COMP_USB is also bit 29. > > Yes, that is OK. One will only be used for PCI-based drivers, and the > other is obviously for USB. As nearly all the bits of a 32-bit > quantity are used, I wanted to save one if possible. > > In the final version, I'll code this as > > #define COMP_USB BIT(29) > #define COMP_EASY_CONCURRENT COMP_USB > > That way will be more obvious. You could also add a comment explaining it, just to make sure that everyone understands it. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
