> Why we can not use ->channel_switch calback for this purpose (merge
> ieee80211_channel_switch and ieee80211_ap_ch_switch)?
>
Well at first (see previous threads) it was a single channel switch
for both AP/STA, but later after community reviews it was decided to
split these two.
>> +static int
>> +ieee80211_ap_process_chanswitch(struct wiphy *wiphy,
>> + struct net_device *dev,
>> + struct ieee80211_ap_ch_switch *ap_ch_switch)
>> +{
>> + struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata = IEEE80211_DEV_TO_SUB_IF(dev);
>> + struct ieee80211_local *local = sdata->local;
>> +
>> + if (!local->ops->channel_switch)
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> Probably you want to check local->ops->ap_channel_switch.
>
This is the evidence ;).
Good catch and thanks for reviewing.
--
Victor.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
