On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 02:53:42PM +0300, Victor Goldenshtein wrote:
> void (*channel_switch)(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
> struct ieee80211_channel_switch *ch_switch);
> + void (*ap_channel_switch)(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
> + struct ieee80211_ap_ch_switch *ap_ch_switch);
Why we can not use ->channel_switch calback for this purpose (merge
ieee80211_channel_switch and ieee80211_ap_ch_switch)?
> +static int
> +ieee80211_ap_process_chanswitch(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> + struct net_device *dev,
> + struct ieee80211_ap_ch_switch *ap_ch_switch)
> +{
> + struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata = IEEE80211_DEV_TO_SUB_IF(dev);
> + struct ieee80211_local *local = sdata->local;
> +
> + if (!local->ops->channel_switch)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
Probably you want to check local->ops->ap_channel_switch.
Stanislaw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
