On 08/10/2012 03:37 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > 2012/8/10 Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> On 08/08/2012 07:37 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> We can not assume parallel flash is always present, there are boards >>> with *serial* flash and probably some without flash at all. >>> Define some bits by the way. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> drivers/ssb/driver_mipscore.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++------- >>> include/linux/ssb/ssb_driver_chipcommon.h | 4 +++- >>> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> I haven't tested this patch on my devices, but it looks good to me. >> In an additional patch we also need a bool or something like this to >> indicate if there is a parallel, serial or no flash present on the SoC. >> For serial and parallel flash it is not possible to have both of them. > > Can I ask why? In theory there are 2 different possible mappings > (SSB_FLASH1 and SSB_FLASH2). > Ok, it could be possible, but the configuration bits in the cc core capabilities currently do not allow such a configuration and I have never heard of such a device. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
