2012/8/10 Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 08/08/2012 07:37 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> We can not assume parallel flash is always present, there are boards >> with *serial* flash and probably some without flash at all. >> Define some bits by the way. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/ssb/driver_mipscore.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++------- >> include/linux/ssb/ssb_driver_chipcommon.h | 4 +++- >> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > I haven't tested this patch on my devices, but it looks good to me. > In an additional patch we also need a bool or something like this to > indicate if there is a parallel, serial or no flash present on the SoC. > For serial and parallel flash it is not possible to have both of them. Can I ask why? In theory there are 2 different possible mappings (SSB_FLASH1 and SSB_FLASH2). -- Rafał -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
