On Wed, 8 Aug 2012 19:20:15 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@xxxxxxxxx> > --- Please see Documentation/SubmittingPatches in Linux sources. In particular, you separated the description of the patch from its contents. Single patch doesn't need to be send as series. The description for the series is not a substitute for a description of every patch. Also, the subject should summarize the patch. I know, it may be hard to fit, but not impossible. When exactly would you have the problem that decrypt_error is not unset, but should be? It's important that you show your assumptions so that others can see if they are correct, in addition to checking the code. Other developers are more likely to check your patch if you show understanding of the code you have changed. > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c > @@ -1780,7 +1780,6 @@ That's weird, recv.c is 1273 lines long in wireless-testing.git. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
