On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Johannes Berg
<johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Instead of operating on a single channel only,
> use the new channel context infrastructure in
> all mac80211 code.
>
> This enables drivers that want to use the new
> channel context infrastructure to use multiple
> channels, while nothing should change for all
> the other drivers that don't support it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
[...]
> static int ieee80211_set_monitor_channel(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> struct ieee80211_channel *chan,
> enum nl80211_channel_type channel_type)
> {
> - return ieee80211_set_channel(wiphy, NULL, chan, channel_type);
> + return 0;
> +//return ieee80211_set_channel(wiphy, NULL, chan, channel_type);
typo?
[...]
> @@ -1278,11 +1271,6 @@ int ieee80211_if_change_type(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
> if (type == ieee80211_vif_type_p2p(&sdata->vif))
> return 0;
>
> - /* Setting ad-hoc mode on non-IBSS channel is not supported. */
> - if (sdata->local->oper_channel->flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IBSS &&
> - type == NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC)
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -
> if (ieee80211_sdata_running(sdata)) {
> ret = ieee80211_runtime_change_iftype(sdata, type);
> if (ret)
> @@ -1294,9 +1282,6 @@ int ieee80211_if_change_type(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
> }
>
> /* reset some values that shouldn't be kept across type changes */
> - sdata->vif.bss_conf.basic_rates =
> - ieee80211_mandatory_rates(sdata->local,
> - sdata->local->oper_channel->band);
was this a bug? shouldn't be updated to use the channel context?
Arik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
