Search Linux Wireless

Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH 2/2] mac80211: Remove control.sta from struct ieee80211_tx_info and restructure tx-path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Virtual box did the job and I found 3 drivers that somehow did not
> complain in my OpenWRT build env... thx for not playing :)... v3 is out.

See, that's why I don't want to play the game -- I could've gone back
and forth with you for like a week over multiple compile failures :-)

> I used wireless-testing and not -next,as in -next the necessary patch
> for mwlk8 is not included but in -testing. So my general question is on
> which tree to develop, on testing or next?

Well, they don't usually diverge much. I guess I can merge in
wireless-next.git and wireless.git into mac80211-next.git if there's a
problem applying. I have meetings now, will try to apply it later.

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux