Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH v2 11/18] brcmsmac: remove some unnessessacry casts and void pointer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Hauke,

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/02/2012 09:54 AM, Dominique Martinet wrote:
>> Julian Calaby wrote on Mon, Jul 02, 2012 :
>>> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/main.c
>>>> index 478b374..8bad8b6 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/main.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/main.c
>>>> @@ -4241,10 +4240,8 @@ static void brcms_b_watchdog(void *arg)
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>>  /* common watchdog code */
>>>> -static void brcms_c_watchdog(void *arg)
>>>> +static void brcms_c_watchdog(struct brcms_c_info *wlc)
>>>>  {
>>>> -       struct brcms_c_info *wlc = (struct brcms_c_info *) arg;
>>>> -
>>>>         BCMMSG(wlc->wiphy, "wl%d\n", wlc->pub->unit);
>>>>
>>>>         if (!wlc->pub->up)
>>>> @@ -4284,7 +4281,9 @@ static void brcms_c_watchdog(void *arg)
>>>>
>>>>  static void brcms_c_watchdog_by_timer(void *arg)
>>>>  {
>>>> -       brcms_c_watchdog(arg);
>>>> +       struct brcms_c_info *wlc = (struct brcms_c_info *) arg;
>>>> +
>>>> +       brcms_c_watchdog(wlc);
>>>
>>> You remove 2 cases of this pattern in your patch then add one. Why?
>>
>> I'm not Hauke :) but as far as I understand, brcms_c_watchdog_by_timer
>> is used by brcms_init_timer which expects a void (*fn) (void *); and
>> which is also used with brcms_c_radio_timer
>> Admitedly, brcms_c_radio_timer also uses a struct brcms_c_info* as
>> argument, so everything could be change this way, but I think it's not
>> completely insane to keep callbacks as void* :)
>>
>> I also see the point of removing this "pattern" since it makes it easier
>> to understand with the proper type information.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
> Yes Dominique is right, that's the reason. I wanted to eliminate some of
> the void *args. I left the void *args when it was called by a callback
> function.

Fair enough then, it just looked odd next to all the other changes.

Thanks,

-- 
Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/
.Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux