On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 11:37 +0300, Arik Nemtsov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Johannes Berg > <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 21:25 +0300, Arik Nemtsov wrote: > >> Previously, a connected STA/AP could send us some AMPDUs right after > >> recovery, without the driver knowing anything about it. > > > > Huh, that description doesn't make a lot of sense? The STA/AP can send > > us AMPDUs anyway without the driver knowing anything about it since it > > has no idea we're restarting ... > > Well the point is to drop them early in the Rx path. Should I change > the description or you don't like the patch in general? I don't mind the patch, I just don't quite understand it still. The driver is receiving the AMPDUs anyway, and if it's passing them up why do we need to drop them? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
