Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ath9k: defer btcoex scheme update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 06:46:00PM +0530, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> Rajkumar Manoharan wrote:
> > As btcoex scheme updation might sleep, remove the function call
> > from tasklet context and queue it up as a separate work.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> > @@ -188,6 +188,9 @@ static bool ath_prepare_reset(struct ath_softc *sc, bool retry_tx, bool flush)
> >  
> >  	ath9k_debug_samp_bb_mac(sc);
> >  	ath9k_hw_disable_interrupts(ah);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ATH9K_BTCOEX_SUPPORT
> > +	cancel_work_sync(&sc->mci_work);
> > +#endif
> 
> I think this should go inside __ath_cancel_work(), otherwise there is a
> chance that this would not be cleaned up properly when stopping the
> interface or unloading the driver.
>
mci_work is queued up by the ath9k_tasklet that is triggered by interrupt
routine. So it is safer to cancel the mci_work after disabling interrupt.
Does it make sense?

--
Rajkumar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux