Sending an RR as a reply to another RR is fine but not quite logical. We should send RRs only as a reply to I frames. Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c b/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c index 0fc60da..3fe68e1 100644 --- a/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c +++ b/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c @@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ static void nfc_llcp_recv_hdlc(struct nfc_llcp_local *local, else if (ptype == LLCP_PDU_RNR) llcp_sock->remote_ready = false; - if (nfc_llcp_queue_i_frames(llcp_sock) == 0) + if (nfc_llcp_queue_i_frames(llcp_sock) == 0 && ptype == LLCP_PDU_I) nfc_llcp_send_rr(llcp_sock); release_sock(sk); -- 1.7.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
