Search Linux Wireless

Re: Ath9k performance testing results (AR9380)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/30/2012 07:48 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
Ben Greear wrote:
I am not sure why there is such a big difference, but possibly
sending wifi is harder than receiving it, and the Atom processor
just can't keep up.

I have a small Atom-based netbook, I'll try with it and see what numbers
can be seen. It's a pain to pry it open and bolt a different card, though. :)

We had to install a hacked 'white-listed' BIOS to get a Lenovo laptop to even POST with
an Atheros NIC in it, so if your NIC works w/out having to hack the BIOS, please
let me know :)

Thanks,
Ben

--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux