Helmut Schaa wrote: > Luis, with rt2800 we are not really able to provide an accurate max tx power :( > so, can we restore the previous behavior in reg.c? Or maybe do something like > > if (chan->max_reg_power) > chan->max_power = min(chan->max_power, chan->max_reg_power); > > Tobias, does that work for you as well? Nope, the problem is that chan->max_power is 0, so this will work: if (chan->max_power == 0) chan->max_power = chan->max_reg_power; else chan->max_power = min(chan->max_power, chan->max_reg_power); Also, in the if-branch above that chan->max_reg_power is never set, I wonder if that should be chan->max_power = chan->orig_mpwr = chan->max_reg_power = (int) MBM_TO_DBM(power_rule->max_eirp); instead of chan->max_power = chan->orig_mpwr = (int) MBM_TO_DBM(power_rule->max_eirp); (But I don't seem to hit that if-block juding from some printks I added) -- Tobias PGP: http://8ef7ddba.uguu.de -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
