On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 14:34 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 03:47:21PM +0200, Timo Lindhorst wrote: > (...) > I'm a little confused about this discussion & Javier's patch though -- > are they related? Yes they are. My patch¹ was fixing the same problem with rate adaptation, but I only handled the case of successful transmission. Timo's patch fixes rate reporting for both successful and failed transmissions, which, in the in-kernel perfect/broken link simulation is all that we need. I would recommend you ignore my patch and take Timo's. As for the in-userspace case, the driver is giving the userspace daemon (e.g. wmediumd) control over which rates to report (see hwsim_tx_info_frame_received_nl() for details). Cheers, Javier [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg89454.html -- Javier Cardona cozybit Inc. http://www.cozybit.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
