On 04/04/2012 05:01 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
+ * @rx_beacons: No. of beacons received.
+ * @rx_frags: No. of rx-fragements received.
Why should the driver keep track of those last two?
Well, for instance, I often see around 5Mbps of total rx bytes
(as counted by the NIC), but much less transmitted. And this is
with stations sending to stations.
I was trying to figure out where the extra packets come from. It
seems beacons is a lot of it so it seemed worth counting. And maybe
fragments count towards that too since there would be more overhead???
As for rx-frags, just seemed useful to know how many frags
were received. My understanding is that this is like receiving
1/2 of a packet at a time...so if we wanted to know how many
real packets the NIC received, we'd need to take frags v/s non-frags
into account. The current logic that counts 'all-packets' for
the rx path is counting individual fragments, I think.
At least for beacons, as long as they are always passed up
the stack, I can count them in the mac80211 layer instead if
you prefer.
Thanks,
Ben
- Felix
--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
