Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx> writes:
>> @@ -973,8 +974,14 @@ void wl12xx_tx_reset(struct wl1271 *wl, bool reset_tx_queues)
>> struct sk_buff *skb;
>> struct ieee80211_tx_info *info;
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < NUM_TX_QUEUES; i++)
>> - wl->tx_queue_count[i] = 0;
>> + /* only reset the queues if something bad happened */
>> + if (WARN_ON(wl1271_tx_total_queue_count(wl) != 0)) {
>
> Let's make all these WARN_ONs as WARN_ON_ONCE as it is recommended
> nowadays. This will make Kalle Valo happier. :)
Hehe. Actually the dislike against WARN_ON() was started by John, I
again started the war to killing BUG_ON() :)
But nevertheless, this changes makes also me happy. I have seen cases
where the whole system reboots because of WARN_ON() spam, so
WARN_ON_ONCE() is much better in in cases where's a possibility that it
will get printed a lot. Of course printk_ratelimit() is another option,
but for some reason it isn't that popular.
--
Kalle Valo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
