On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 11:32 +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 15:01 +0100, Nicolas Cavallari wrote: > > > Hostapd already does that¹ ... after the association response is acked. > > > > Ok maybe then we should send out assoc resp etc. frames and not subject > > them to PS queueing? Jouni? > > We should try to follow the clarified description of management frame > buffering in P802.11-REVmb/D12.0 (i.e., soon to be published IEEE Std > 802.11-2012). (Re)Association Response frame is not a bufferable > management frame and as such, it needs to be sent out without being > subject to PS queuing. Ah yes, you mentioned before that this was being clarified but I forgot about it again. I'll take a look. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
