On 01/04/2012 10:16 AM, Daniel Halperin wrote:
Sorry, Larry, I didn't see this til it was included in John's mail this morning.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Larry Finger<Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+static int rtl8192cu_usb_suspend(struct usb_interface *pusb_intf,
+ pm_message_t message)
+{
+ /* Increase usage_count to Save loaded fw across suspend/resume */
+ atomic_inc(&usage_count);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int rtl8192cu_usb_resume(struct usb_interface *pusb_intf)
+{
+ atomic_dec(&usage_count); /* after resume, decrease usage count */
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
Based on the warning-fix I submitted yesterday, this probably produces
a warning if CONFIG_PM is set but not CONFIG_PM_SLEEP. My patch was
for an ethernet driver, but iwlwifi and ath5k appear to follow the
same pattern using CONFIG_PM_SLEEP instead of the above.
See: http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg184717.html for the patch
and http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg184715.html for the
discussion.
Thanks for the note. I will prepare a revised patch.
What architecture gave the warning? Of x86_64, I was unable to get
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP without CONFIG_PM.
Larry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
