On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 10:22 +0100, Dmitry Tarnyagin wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 00:38 +0100, Dmitry Tarnyagin wrote: >> ... or abort suspend on the driver's level. It's perfectly ok for me. But then >> driver needs to be at least notified that WLAN is suspending. What do you >> think about early-suspend driver callback which to be called before any >> possibly locking operations in mac80211 code? > > That's seems reasonable. > Ok, I will play with it a bit... > Well whenever it would have to wait for the mutex, even if it just has > to wait 1ms for it... That will *certainly* trigger *randomly* on normal > laptops systems and cause a TON of bug reports from users saying "my > system randomly refuses to suspend". > Oh, yes, true.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
