On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 9 December 2011 19:49, Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Sending as RFC for now since I'm not sure if this is really required. At least >> I couldn't come up with a situation where this would be required. However, it >> looks more correct to me to put the BAR into the same queue as the previously >> failed QoS frame to avoid possible (?) side effect of the BAR overtaking frames >> in the hw tx queues ... > > I've had to do this in FreeBSD, for more than just the BAR frame - I > do this for the ADDBA and null management frames too, just to be sure > that frames aren't dropped by the other end. Hmm, good point. Also, a DELBA overtaking AMPDUs in the hw queues could be a problem ... Helmut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
