On 9 December 2011 19:49, Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sending as RFC for now since I'm not sure if this is really required. At least > I couldn't come up with a situation where this would be required. However, it > looks more correct to me to put the BAR into the same queue as the previously > failed QoS frame to avoid possible (?) side effect of the BAR overtaking frames > in the hw tx queues ... I've had to do this in FreeBSD, for more than just the BAR frame - I do this for the ADDBA and null management frames too, just to be sure that frames aren't dropped by the other end. So, +1 from me. :) Adrian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html