Hi 2011/11/28 Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 17:15 -0500, Nikolay Martynov wrote: >> If other side sent us non zero timeout in addba response use it as a >> timeout for TX session. Before this patch initiator and recipient >> could have different timeouts if recipient decides to change timeout >> offered by initiator. > > I'm not convinced this is correct, can you say where the standard says > that we should take the recipient's timeout? The way I read it, the > originator informs the recipient of its timeout, not the other way > around, and we implement that in agg-rx. Sorry, about this. I just though that if addba resp contains timeout then there should be some use of it. If this goes against standard just disregard this patch. BTW, is it possible to download a copy of the standard or is it something I need to pay for/subscribe to? Thanks! -- Truthfully yours, Martynov Nikolay. Email: mar.kolya@xxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
