On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 17:15 -0500, Nikolay Martynov wrote: > If other side sent us non zero timeout in addba response use it as a > timeout for TX session. Before this patch initiator and recipient > could have different timeouts if recipient decides to change timeout > offered by initiator. I'm not convinced this is correct, can you say where the standard says that we should take the recipient's timeout? The way I read it, the originator informs the recipient of its timeout, not the other way around, and we implement that in agg-rx. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
