Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] mac80211: Support ht-cap over-rides.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/17/2011 09:25 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 09:22 -0800, Ben Greear wrote:

We can't, but can't we like assign sdata->ht_caps = sband->ht_caps? Or
maybe even calculate restricted HT caps for both 2.4 and 5 GHz?
Basically what I was thinking is this:

struct sub_if_data {
	...
	struct ieee80211_sta_ht_cap ht_cap[num_bands];
	...
};

So we'd have to copy this data from sbands[] upon creation
of the interface to make sure it is always initialized?
This would allow us to easily support the overrides for
non-station interfaces, so I do like that benefit.

Can the sbands[] data ever change for any reason once
an interface is created?  If not, then probably this is
doable.  If it can change, then we are screwed.

I don't think it can change but it's not const (I think?) so drivers
might do stupid things -- but that would be buggy anyway.

I can imagine someone wanting to poke at a driver to enable/disable
features, but no idea if it is done yet.

It seems you are basically wanting to copy the sband[] data
local to each interface (sdata), and then we would remove sband from most
(or all?) of the method calls that deal with sband->ht_caps?

I guess. Though we still need the band to know which one to use (I'm
reluctant to say we just need one due to channel switching etc.)

Looks like quite a bit of code churn, and probably requiring at least two
patches:
   * Get rid of sband usage by copying the sband data into sdata
   * Add the over-ride logic

Yeah. It might be *too much* churn, but that's what I was thinking. If
you think it's likely too much churn let's go with what you have now,
there are only a few minor things about it I don't like much.

I would much rather use something similar to my last-posted patch.  I
think it is a lot less risky than rewriting all of the sband usage.

I'll rebase against the latest wireless-testing and post a patch
for further review, hopefully later today.

Thanks,
Ben

--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux