On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 09:27 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > > So I still stand by what I said earlier -- you should not allow > > advertising a smaller value than the hardware wanted to use initially. > > If the AP doesn't use that smaller value, all is well, but if it > > actually uses a smaller value then the hardware might fall over. > > Ok, I'll add that restriction. When this all settles, maybe I > can get some info from the ath9k folks about what their hardware > can actually support. There's little point in advertising something bigger than the HW supports, so I'd say that's the smallest :-) (ok, so this might be for hw crypto, etc., but ath9k could advertise a smaller value when hw crypto is disabled for example) johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
