Hi, > > Since we need to fix cmp_ie() anyway, how about we change it there as > > well. I'm going to post a patch. > I assume there is some (unclear for me) idea behind the order of operation > in the cmp_ie comparator. Natural order of scan output? Well, the sort order here matters only for the tree search and is clearly broken for that. I just sent a patch to fix that. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
