Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 1/1] rfkill: add module option to become inactive.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 13:34 +0400, Andrew V. Stepanov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Johannes Berg
> <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 12:46 +0400, Andrew V. Stepanov wrote:
> >
> >> I wan't to completely ignore events (state) of software\hardware rfkill buttons.
> >
> > Why would you ever want to do that? I can see that you might want to
> > ignore soft buttons, but you can use urfkilld for that. Ignoring hard
> > buttons is completely useless -- they will affect the device they're
> > wired up to *anyway*.
> 
> No. That is not true.
> 
> Hardware rfkill button doesn't have any action to wlan\bluetooth
> devices on ThinkPad x201i with "CONFIG_RFKILL is not set".
> I can assume this is true for other notebooks.

Then why is it a hard button instead of the soft button on a separate
platform device?

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux