On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 12:03 +0400, Andrew V. Stepanov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Johannes Berg > <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 14:33 +0400, Andrew V. Stepanov wrote: > >> From: Andriy Stepanov <stanv@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Use as: > >> modprobe rfkill unblocked=1 > >> or > >> /etc/modprobe.d/options > >> options rfkill unblocked=1 > > > > Apart from the obvious style problems in this patch (tons of extra > > braces) I'm not convinced this is a good idea. > > > > What problem does it solve? Why can that problem not be solved > > differently with existing mechanisms (e.g. urfkilld configured to do > > nothing)? > 2. urfkilld can't be used to ignore Hard blocked buttons. Oh that's a good point -- so NACK on the patch. You *can't* ignore hard block buttons. All you can ignore is events from them, which is definitely not useful. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
