On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> This is not really an IBSS specific issue. It applies to WDS or monitor mode >> as well. > > Excellent point! > >> If we want to properly enforce Annex J channel pairs, this needs to >> be moved to cfg80211. > > This does not still address the issue of one peer finding out it > cannot deal with an HT40 pair and correcting the topology and > propagating this out. Not yet sure if for 802.11ac we'll need > something similar but its worth considering. Sorry I meant section 11.14.3.2 which deals with neighboring BSSes from the scan list, the annex J stuff would still need to be done by all the initial radiators too though for a primary. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
