On 2011-09-20 11:26 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Felix Fietkau<nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If we want to properly enforce Annex J channel pairs, this needs to
be moved to cfg80211.
This does not still address the issue of one peer finding out it
cannot deal with an HT40 pair and correcting the topology and
propagating this out. Not yet sure if for 802.11ac we'll need
something similar but its worth considering.
Don't think of it as a topology. Each node makes its own decisions about
HT40+/HT40-/HT20. If modes are incompatible, fallback to HT20 always
works for communicating with a peer.
- Felix
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
