On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:27:20PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > The problem is that brcmsmac duplicates code present in the bcma > driver. It doesn't use bcma bus architecture. > > The real solution is to add bcma driver support in brcmsmac and ssb > driver support in brcmfmac. Then you can always use bcma and: > 1) If b43 will load and detect unsupported PHY, it will release the BCMA's core > 2) brcmsmac will be loaded to let it support the core We are going to have to find a way to get brcmsmac into the wireless-next tree to make it feasible for the Broadcom guys to get bcma support into that driver. Do you agree? We could move it under the drivers/net/wireless tree. Or, maybe I could negotiate with Greg to keep it under the drivers/staging tree but to let me manage it under wireless-next. Or...? Do you have any thoughts on this? John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
