Hi Greg On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:51:26PM -0500, Greg Dietsche wrote: > On 09/06/2011 10:01 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > >I put patches here: > >http://people.redhat.com/sgruszka/iwlegacy_cleanup.tar.bz2 > > > >They are on top of wireless-testing tree. > <snip> > >Series include your 2 patches. You can test this cleanup and > >apply your new changes on top. I'll not do any further cleanup > >for some time now, perhaps continue when I got public git tree. > > > Thanks! I've re-worked my patches and you can find them here: > http://www.gregd.org/stuff/linux/iwlegacy_cleanup_greg.tar.bz2 > > I also decided to play with github a little bit: > git://github.com/dietsche/linux.git and pushed two branches: > 1) wireless-next-iwlegacy-stanislaw - your patch set > 2) wireless-next-iwlegacy-stanislaw-greg - a branch that has my > additional patches. > `git format-patch wireless-next-iwlegacy-stanislaw..wireless-next-iwlegacy-stanislaw-greg` > will generate the patches that are in the link i posted above. Cool! > The first two patches in my series are the ones that I think folks > should take a closer look at. The rest are pretty safe. The second patch is ok. I'm not sure about first one, but we can get rid of "ctx = il_rxon_ctx_from_vif(vif)" at all, because we have only one context. Removing il_rxon_context structure from iwlegacy driver is my long term plan, you can look at that if you wish. Thanks Stanislaw -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
