W dniu 18 sierpnia 2011 09:51 użytkownik David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał: > On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 08:46 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> >> Tested on my BCM43224, thanks a lot! :) >> >> Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> You didn't send this directly to John, not sure if he will pick it up. >> >> Do you think this should go for 3.1? With this patch ppl will directly >> see interface is present and will just use it or see error about >> firmware in dmesg. Without the patch, person just have to know b43 is >> supposed to support his card. > > Yes, it should go in for 3.1. > > I wasn't really expecting John to pick it up. You are the maintainer of > drivers/bcma, so I'd expect to send it to *you*. Many maintainers would > be unhappy at patches being sent upstream and bypassing them. Normally > I'd expect you to pick up the patch and add it to your tree/queue with > your own signed-off-by, and for it to go upstream that way. I can accept sending patch directly to John, if I'm included in CC and linux-wireless is included as well. However, I can work the way you proposed as well :) Thanks for the patch, just sent it to John. -- Rafał -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
