On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 08:46 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > Tested on my BCM43224, thanks a lot! :) > > Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> > > You didn't send this directly to John, not sure if he will pick it up. > > Do you think this should go for 3.1? With this patch ppl will directly > see interface is present and will just use it or see error about > firmware in dmesg. Without the patch, person just have to know b43 is > supposed to support his card. Yes, it should go in for 3.1. I wasn't really expecting John to pick it up. You are the maintainer of drivers/bcma, so I'd expect to send it to *you*. Many maintainers would be unhappy at patches being sent upstream and bypassing them. Normally I'd expect you to pick up the patch and add it to your tree/queue with your own signed-off-by, and for it to go upstream that way. Of course, I'm happy to send it on directly if that's what you prefer. -- dwmw2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
